Mark maine sex offender

Maine Sex Offender Registry

More than men and women are listed on Maine's Sex Offender Lt. Mark Cornelio, with Lewiston police, said it is up to offenders to work. Organizational Charts · Careers at Public Safety · Find A Facility · Find An Inmate · Sex Offender Registry · Fingerprinting · Most Wanted Violators · WEBSITE. WINDHAM, Maine — Nathaniel Sargent could have been a free man in less than a year. with monsters and predators like a modern day branding mark. . Maine's sex offender registry has been one of the most visited.

More than men and women are listed on Maine's Sex Offender Lt. Mark Cornelio, with Lewiston police, said it is up to offenders to work. Registry Search. Individual Profile. Name: Mark Salisbury; Date of Birth: 09/24/​ Town of (Primary) Domicile: Lewiston, ME. Place of employment: Mls Lawn​. WINDHAM, Maine — Nathaniel Sargent could have been a free man in less than a year. with monsters and predators like a modern day branding mark. . Maine's sex offender registry has been one of the most visited.

WINDHAM, Maine — Nathaniel Sargent could have been a free man in less than a year. with monsters and predators like a modern day branding mark. . Maine's sex offender registry has been one of the most visited. Registry Search. Individual Profile. Name: Mark Salisbury; Date of Birth: 09/24/​ Town of (Primary) Domicile: Lewiston, ME. Place of employment: Mls Lawn​. FARMINGTON — A sex offender is accused of registering an address for life under the Maine Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act.






Rather than bear the burden that comes with that maine, Sargent accepted a four-year prison sentence on a more serious charge. Sargent has accepted many of the ways people might label him. But, in his mind, Sargent is not a sex offender, a label mark has become synonymous with monsters and predators like a modern day branding mark.

If anyone touched them … you know what I mean? It was only by offender careful legal maneuvering that Sargent, born and raised in Hancock County, ended up in Windham to serve a four-year sentence for aggravated assault. A misdemeanor charge of sexual abuse of a minor was what worried Sargent more than the threat of a lengthy jail sentence. Some of those concerns have yet to be fully addressed. Bill Diamond, D-Windham, has spent as much time as any lawmaker discussing and crafting policies on convicted sex offenders and said there are inherent flaws.

So as the state continues to debate changes to sex offender laws — some federally mandated — an uncomfortable question emerges: Are offender any safer? Police and sexual assault awareness advocates agree, though, that only a small percentage of rapes are actually reported. On Easter Morning, April 16,Marshall took the lives of two registered offenders in cold-blooded fashion. The killer knew only the faces, charges and addresses of his victims. About 15 hours after his killing spree, inside a Greyhound bus on a Massachusetts highway, he put a.

For legislators, the killings of Gray and Elliott forced them to take a harder look at the registry, but initial discussions did not result in significant changes. Yes, he engaged in a sex act with a year-old girl when he sex Yes, he exhibited bad judgment. But the sex was consensual, he said. And after three weeks dating the girl, Sargent realized maine was in a lose-lose situation.

Sargent said he was ready to go to trial and make his case, but when his attorney brokered the deal, he accepted. Toothaker, an Ellsworth defense attorney who sex represents sex offenders, said Sargent is simply not in that category. The hurdle is that the discussion about what sex do with sex offenders and how to distribute information about them continues to be dominated by emotion rather than common sense or credible statistics.

There is no murder registry. No arson registry. No drug dealer registry. No drunken driver registry, although Rep. So, why are sex offenders subjected to such scrutiny? Over the last three months, the number of offender records retrieved averaged about 14, per day, orper week, according to Mark Tolhurst, director of development for Maine.

The federal Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act ofwhich mark state offender registries, was created under the promise of safety. If people have access to information, they can take precautions. Maine paradox, however, is that society spends its time worried about the small percentage of offenders who truly are violent predators, but overlooks the massive number of offenders who know or are related to their victims.

But while efforts are made to track offenders after they have committed crimes, there is no concerted effort to counsel sex offenders or to identify the root causes of sex crimes. Additionally, there is no mechanism to determine risk of re-offense, according to Barbara Schwartz, director sex the Department of Corrections Sex Offender Treatment program. Several tools exist to measure risk, but lawmakers are ever fearful of the cost.

In addition to the deaths of Elliott and Gray, numerous sex offenders have reported various levels offender assault and harassment over mark years. Others cannot. Most psychologists agree that harassment of offenders often leads to social isolation and depression, which could impede rehabilitation and cause some to re-offend. Maine that sense, registry requirements may harm, not protect, public safety. Late last month, there were nearly 3, A decade ago, only a few crimes required sex offender registration.

Now, that list offender close to 20 categories of crimes. Despite exponential growth, offender current number of offenders actually is smaller than maine was about a year ago. Inthe state passed a law that required all offenders convicted of crimes from to to register, which effectively doubled the number of registrants. Courts have since ruled that requirement constitutes retroactive punishment and is unconstitutional.

In response, the Legislature amended the law. The amendment, passed in late mark, allows registrants convicted of crimes between and to petition to come off the registry if they offender certain criteria. So far, Cote said, about have been successful. A year before its eventual passage, Gov. John Baldacci vetoed a bill passed by the Legislature that would have allowed the change to come sooner. Maine state Rep. Pat Blanchette of Bangor said she is haunted by her vote to create a registry that does not differentiate among offenses.

The Adam Walsh Act, passed increates a tiered system that categorizes offenders based on the severity of their crimes and the risk they pose to society. Only a handful of states have come into compliance with the Adam Walsh Act to date, and Maine is not one of them.

The federal law mandates that states make sex offender information available to the public, but the amount of information varies. Massachusetts and Vermont list only offenders identified as high risk.

New Hampshire lists people convicted offender offenses against children and indicates the general age of victims. Law enforcement agencies across the state have access to much more information but the Law Court has heard cases arguing whether the public needs access to the same information. Diamond said Maine would do well to create an online registry similar sex what Massachusetts has done.

A second ranking maine would make available the names of medium-risk sex offenders to the police and to the public upon request. Lawmakers, however, have targeted other bills aimed at sex offenders, sometimes at mark risk of exacerbating the real inequities. Just last week, state senators rejected a Republican-led bill that would have created stricter residency restrictions for sex offenders.

The House followed suit earlier this week. Most experts agree that residency mark are little more than feel-good laws that do nothing to protect the public.

The city of Bangor came to that conclusion last winter when it rejected a similar proposal sex by a concerned citizen. What are we doing about that? So why is the Legislature spending so much time on residency restrictions but cannot create a true tiered system? Because there are few public supporters of sex offender rights.

Public shaming? Back at the Maine Correctional Center in Windham, Nathaniel Sargent talks about how he plans to pick up the pieces of his life. He talks about reconnecting with his two young maine, who he knows have suffered without having their father around.

His picture and his address and his place of work will not be immortalized on a website for anyone to see. Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories. More from BDN. December 05, Nathaniel Sargent, 22, of Sullivan talks about being incarcerated mark a recent morning at the Maine Correctional Center in Windham. Sargent pleaded guilty sex in Hancock County Superior Court to a felony assault sex in offender to have a misdemeanor sexual abuse of a minor charge dropped.

The biggest reason, he said, was so he wouldn't have to register as a sex offender for the next 10 years. You may also like. Police arrest 2 men for murder in death of Bangor man. Bangor superintendent blocked BDN reporter on Twitter after critical news coverage. Trial set for Maine man accused of killing mother, grandparents in Massachusetts.

The paradox, however, is that society spends its time worried about the small percentage of offenders who truly are violent predators, but overlooks the massive number of offenders who know or are related to their victims.

But while efforts are made to track offenders after they have committed crimes, there is no concerted effort to counsel sex offenders or to identify the root causes of sex crimes. Additionally, there is no mechanism to determine risk of re-offense, according to Barbara Schwartz, director of the Department of Corrections Sex Offender Treatment program. Several tools exist to measure risk, but lawmakers are ever fearful of the cost.

In addition to the deaths of Elliott and Gray, numerous sex offenders have reported various levels of assault and harassment over the years. Others cannot. Most psychologists agree that harassment of offenders often leads to social isolation and depression, which could impede rehabilitation and cause some to re-offend. In that sense, registry requirements may harm, not protect, public safety. Late last month, there were nearly 3, A decade ago, only a few crimes required sex offender registration.

Now, that list includes close to 20 categories of crimes. Despite exponential growth, the current number of offenders actually is smaller than it was about a year ago. In , the state passed a law that required all offenders convicted of crimes from to to register, which effectively doubled the number of registrants.

Courts have since ruled that requirement constitutes retroactive punishment and is unconstitutional. In response, the Legislature amended the law. The amendment, passed in late , allows registrants convicted of crimes between and to petition to come off the registry if they met certain criteria. So far, Cote said, about have been successful. A year before its eventual passage, Gov. John Baldacci vetoed a bill passed by the Legislature that would have allowed the change to come sooner.

Former state Rep. Pat Blanchette of Bangor said she is haunted by her vote to create a registry that does not differentiate among offenses. The Adam Walsh Act, passed in , creates a tiered system that categorizes offenders based on the severity of their crimes and the risk they pose to society. Only a handful of states have come into compliance with the Adam Walsh Act to date, and Maine is not one of them.

The federal law mandates that states make sex offender information available to the public, but the amount of information varies. Massachusetts and Vermont list only offenders identified as high risk. New Hampshire lists people convicted of offenses against children and indicates the general age of victims.

Law enforcement agencies across the state have access to much more information but the Law Court has heard cases arguing whether the public needs access to the same information. Diamond said Maine would do well to create an online registry similar to what Massachusetts has done. A second ranking tier would make available the names of medium-risk sex offenders to the police and to the public upon request.

Lawmakers, however, have targeted other bills aimed at sex offenders, sometimes at the risk of exacerbating the real inequities. Just last week, state senators rejected a Republican-led bill that would have created stricter residency restrictions for sex offenders. The House followed suit earlier this week. Most experts agree that residency restrictions are little more than feel-good laws that do nothing to protect the public.

The city of Bangor came to that conclusion last winter when it rejected a similar proposal brought by a concerned citizen. What are we doing about that? So why is the Legislature spending so much time on residency restrictions but cannot create a true tiered system? Because there are few public supporters of sex offender rights. Public shaming? Back at the Maine Correctional Center in Windham, Nathaniel Sargent talks about how he plans to pick up the pieces of his life.

He talks about reconnecting with his two young children, who he knows have suffered without having their father around. His picture and his address and his place of work will not be immortalized on a website for anyone to see. Marshal for the District of Massachusetts made the announcement. Assistant U. Attorneys Alex J. Grant and Katharine A. This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse, launched in May by the Department of Justice.

Led by U. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www. You are here U. Department of Justice. Friday, January 6, Topic s :.